One of the many things we didn't get at Apple's big iPhone 5 event was wireless charging. Palm has inductive charging all the way back to 2009 and the original Palm Pre and TouchStone. Samsung incorporated resonance charging into the new Galaxy S III, and Nokia showed off wireless charging with the upcoming Lumia 920. Apple, however, is sticking to wired and the new Lightning.
Apple SVP of Marketing, Phil Schiller, recently said:
[Wireless] charging systems still have to be plugged into the wall, so it?s not clear how much convenience they add. The widely-adopted USB cord, meanwhile, can charge in wall outlets, computers and even on airplanes. Having to create another device you have to plug into the wall is actually, for most situations, more complicated.
But what do you think? Did Apple lose a step by not including wireless charging? If so, is it a big enough problem to be a deal-breaker to you or just one more minor annoyance? Do you think Apple is still waiting but will introduce wireless charging one day? Could you care less? Or are you happy Apple is sticking to traditional, albeit smaller, hardline power solutions?
You know the drill! Vote up top and leave me a comment below saying why you voted the way you did!
 |  |
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheIphoneBlog/~3/56KM0bO71IE/story01.htm
terminator salvation deron williams jarhead montrose marshawn lynch earthquake bay area clear channel
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.